Private AI for independent London law practices

Private AI for confidential legal work.

Less time on administration. Verifiable control over client information.

A practical trial for independent law firms. A solicitor dictates notes after a meeting, and our private system produces a draft attendance note and task list. The solicitor reviews and approves every word before anything is saved to the case file.

Book a 20-minute workflow discussionReview the control boundary
Zero external training: Client information is never retained or trained on by public model providers.
Human in the loop: Nothing is written back to case management without fee-earner verification.
Measured results: Evaluated against total task time saved, including review and correction time.
01 • A practical starting point

A useful first workflow: post-meeting attendance notes

Rather than attempting an unmanageable firm-wide overhaul, we start with one frequent administrative bottleneck: capturing client discussions and extracting next actions.

1

Solicitor dictates note

Immediately following a consultation or court hearing, the fee-earner dictates thoughts into an approved, secure recording interface.

Input stage
2

Private processing

Speech is transcribed and formatted in an isolated environment. The model extracts key facts, legal context, and explicit follow-up tasks.

Private model
3

Fee-earner reviews

The solicitor reviews the formatted draft, corrects nuances, and confirms the extracted actions. The model never assumes unverified facts.

Human verification
4

Approved write-back

Only when the fee-earner clicks approve is the finalised attendance note and task calendar entry committed to the matter file.

System of record
02 • Governance & compliance

The proposed control boundary

Confidential casework demands rigorous technical segregation. Deployment data flows and permissions are signed off with your compliance team before a single client file enters the trial.

Your firm decides

  • Authorised user group: Exactly which partners, associates, and administrative staff have access.
  • Matter accessibility: Which practice areas or matter classifications can be processed through the workflow.
  • Retention schedules: How long raw audio and interim drafts are stored before irreversible cryptographic purging.
  • Approval policy: Strict prohibition on autonomous or unreviewed write-backs to matter history.

We configure and test

  • Isolated model execution: Private processing where zero client data is logged or used to train external models.
  • Restricted integration gates: Scoped, read-only API connectors that prevent unconstrained database access.
  • Auditable activity records: Tamper-evident logging documenting when a note was generated, who reviewed it, and when it was filed.
  • Incumbent IT alignment: We agree responsibilities directly with your internal IT staff or managed service provider.
03 • Low-risk delivery

A small trial with an explicit decision

We do not ask firms to commit to large, speculative digital transformation projects. We agree on fixed boundaries and evaluate concrete time savings.

Phase 01

Scope

One workflow. A pilot group of approximately five fee-earners. We define baseline controls and provide a fixed-scope written quote.

Bounded commitment
Phase 02

Test

Initial runs take place using synthetic sample data to confirm output quality, formatting, transcription accuracy, and access controls safely.

Zero-risk validation
Phase 03

Decide

We measure real task time, including fee-earner review and corrections. You receive clear evidence to expand, refine, or stop.

Evidence-based expansion

Evidence for your buying decision

Time saved

Measured by total task completion time, including review corrections, versus manual post-meeting drafting.

Quality retained

Evaluated against firm precedents and reference attendance notes to ensure accuracy and nuance remain intact.

Controls tested

Proof of role-based boundaries, data isolation, and verified fee-earner sign-off before case-file write-back.

Transparent cost

Clear, all-inclusive pricing covering inference infrastructure, integration, support, and ongoing maintenance.

Designed to complement your existing practice management software

We do not ask you to replace your case management or document management platforms, such as Clio, LEAP, Peppermint, or NetDocuments. We scope our integrations around your existing IT environment and agree clear boundaries with your current IT provider.

Non-disruptive trial • Standard SRA & GDPR alignment

Talk to our legal team

Discuss a private trial for your fee-earners or send us a message below.

Legal practices team

020 4577 3099